docs: improve doctests for ndarray instances in ndarray/some

[kaushal-kumar-it]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: passed
• task: lint_package_json status: na
• task: lint_repl_help status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: passed
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Progresses #9329.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Improves doctests for ndarray instances in ndarray/some, ensuring that
  examples demonstrate behavior using .get() and inline ndarray output
  formatting consistent with the project style.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request has the following related issues:

• [RFC]: Improve doctests for ndarray instances in documentation examples (tracking issue) #9329

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

AI Assistance

When authoring the changes proposed in this PR, did you use any kind of AI assistance?

• Yes
• No

Disclosure

If you answered "yes" to using AI assistance, please provide a short disclosure indicating how you used AI assistance.

N/A

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
ndarray/some	$color{green}499/499$ $color{green}+0.00%$	$color{green}53/53$ $color{green}+0.00%$	$color{green}3/3$ $color{green}+0.00%$	$color{green}499/499$ $color{green}+0.00%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[kgryte]

LGTM after some clean-up.