Merged
Conversation
stevensJourney
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2026
Contributor
stevensJourney
left a comment
stevensJourney
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Happy with the changes 
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This adds support for new raw table features for version 0.4.11 of the core extension. For more context, also see the Kotlin PR.
This adds the
RawTableSchemaclass containing the name of a raw table with additional options. It can be passed to the newRawTable.inferredconstructor, which then makes theputanddeletestatements optional because they can be inferred from the database schema.This also adds
RawTable.clear, which has been added in the previous core extension update.Because a
RawTableSchemaalso contains options that are shared with regular JSON-based tables, I've extracted them into a shared class. To keep backwards-compatibility (and especially to keepTableconstructorsconst), I've madeTableextend the newTableOptionsclass. I've also deprecated the ability to extendTable, the class is really just a descriptive struct and we don't want users to potentially override methods likevalidate.