Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Important Review skippedDraft detected. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @wk989898, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the observability of the redo sink component by introducing a comprehensive set of new metrics. It centralizes metric collection within a dedicated structure, allowing for more granular tracking of redo log operations and worker performance. The changes also ensure that monitoring dashboards accurately reflect these new and refined metrics, providing better insights into the redo sink's behavior. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces new metrics for the redo log sink, replacing the generic statistics collector. The changes include adding new Prometheus metrics for redo log operations, integrating them into the redo sink, and updating Grafana dashboards to use these new metrics. My review focuses on the correctness of the new metrics implementation and potential regressions. I've identified a potential regression where batch-level metrics are no longer reported, and a couple of areas for improvement in the new metrics code.
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (s *Sink) AddDMLEvent(event *commonEvent.DMLEvent) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By removing statistics.RecordBatchExecution, we've lost valuable batch-level metrics such as ExecBatchHistogram (batch size in rows) and ExecBatchWriteBytesHistogram (batch size in bytes). While new per-row metrics are added, these batch metrics are important for monitoring and performance tuning. Was this intentional? If not, please consider reintroducing them or providing an equivalent.
| @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ | |||
| // Copyright 2026 PingCAP, Inc. | |||
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #1061
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note