Skip to content

Conversation

@dkharms
Copy link
Member

@dkharms dkharms commented Nov 20, 2025

Description

I've placed skip on benchmarks that are useless.


  • I have read and followed all requirements in CONTRIBUTING.md;
  • I used LLM/AI assistance to make this pull request;

If you have used LLM/AI assistance please provide model name and full prompt:

Model: {{model-name}}
Prompt: {{prompt}}

@dkharms dkharms self-assigned this Nov 20, 2025
@dkharms dkharms added ci/cd Improvements for our CI/CD process benchmarks Features or improvements over our benchmark processes labels Nov 20, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 20, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 71.27%. Comparing base (627de89) to head (4dc3d4e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #270      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.29%   71.27%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         200      200              
  Lines       14557    14557              
==========================================
- Hits        10378    10376       -2     
- Misses       3450     3451       +1     
- Partials      729      730       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

benchmarks Features or improvements over our benchmark processes ci/cd Improvements for our CI/CD process

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants