Add basic support for JTAG over FTDI in bitbang mode#118
Open
mon wants to merge 1 commit intodlbeer:masterfrom
Open
Add basic support for JTAG over FTDI in bitbang mode#118mon wants to merge 1 commit intodlbeer:masterfrom
mon wants to merge 1 commit intodlbeer:masterfrom
Conversation
Author
|
As an extra note - I have an alternate branch,
With these changes, programming time is on the order of 2 seconds.
|
|
Thank you for your PR. I tested the branch ftdi-bitbang-dev on MSP430F2370 and works.
|
Author
|
I'm very happy to hear it works for you as well! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This does make some small architectural changes to the pif layer, but I hope it's acceptable.
Assorted notes
jtbitbang_set_fast_baudfunction is required, but the mehfet driver used it and it seemed like it was neededFurther work will be to look into MPSSE for the FT4232H to increase speed more. The mspdebug backend seems inefficient (though reliable), especially since every state change, even those that can reasonably be batched, needs to written out over USB. I tried batching all writes unless TCK or RST was strobed, but it broke device identification - I suspect there's some early step that requires pin toggles to be synchronous.
Programming in general on the MSP430 architecture seems hugely inefficient. Each word takes over 16 bytes of instructions over the wire. I have yet to verify this, but I suspect the MSP-FET might upload a small bit of assembly to locally program data from RAM, then use the auto-incrementing RAM load feature to program the data in chunks.