Merged
Conversation
917aef1 to
2f3dfd0
Compare
RobBuchananCompPhys
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2026
Contributor
RobBuchananCompPhys
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good - a couple of suggestions from me.
…airPotentialEnergyValue.
Co-authored-by: RobBuchanan <106311829+RobBuchananCompPhys@users.noreply.github.com>
00d3744 to
ee70d23
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a
SpeciesKernelspecifically for the calculation of energies and forces within aSpecies, leaving the largerEnergyKernelandForceKernelclasses to focus exclusively onConfigurations. This involved a lot of (beneficial) refactoring along the way, so not the most interesting PR in the world, but will make subsequent required efforts onEnergyNodeand the intended absence ofForcesNodeway smaller.Oh, and we also remove
GeometryOptimisationModule- never used AFAIK.