Contributor License Agreement (CLA) workflow#205
Open
hanneshapke wants to merge 1 commit intodataiku:mainfrom
Open
Contributor License Agreement (CLA) workflow#205hanneshapke wants to merge 1 commit intodataiku:mainfrom
hanneshapke wants to merge 1 commit intodataiku:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Regarding the CLA workflow:
If we can use a Gist on Github, a repo admin could set up the CLA from https://cla-assistant.io/ (built by SAP).
The setup looks like below (just with the correct repo and Gist)


An alternative is this PR:
It uses https://github.com/cla-assistant/cla-assistant but runs the entire signing without the need for Gist. The text can be loaded from the repo. Downside: 1) It needs a write token to write the user information to a file, and 2) the file with the CLA "signature information" is part of the repo (Name and email are visible through their commits anyway) (admin needed). We could also write to a private repo that only contains the CLA signature information, but we would need to set up another repository (admin needed).
@pbertin Which option do you prefer?