Skip to content

Conversation

@stevemac007
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements.txt
⚠️ Warning
zappa 0.20.2 has requirement boto3==1.4.0, but you have boto3 1.4.5.
zappa 0.20.2 has requirement tqdm==4.8.3, but you have tqdm 4.11.2.
zappa 0.20.2 has requirement Werkzeug==0.11.10, but you have Werkzeug 0.15.5.
zappa 0.20.2 has requirement wheel==0.29.0, but you have wheel 0.42.0.
requests 2.20.0 requires urllib3, which is not installed.
Jinja2 2.11.3 requires MarkupSafe, which is not installed.
boto3 1.4.5 has requirement botocore<1.6.0,>=1.5.0, but you have botocore 1.4.42.
boto3 1.4.5 has requirement s3transfer<0.2.0,>=0.1.10, but you have s3transfer 0.1.1.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link

Code review in progress. Analyzing for code quality issues and best practices. You can monitor the review status in the checks section at the bottom of this pull request. Detailed findings will be posted upon completion.

Using Amazon Q Developer for GitHub

Amazon Q Developer1 is an AI-powered assistant that integrates directly into your GitHub workflow, enhancing your development process with intelligent features for code development, review, and transformation.

Slash Commands

Command Description
/q <message> Chat with the agent to ask questions or request revisions
/q review Requests an Amazon Q powered code review
/q help Displays usage information

Features

Agentic Chat
Enables interactive conversation with Amazon Q to ask questions about the pull request or request specific revisions. Use /q <message> in comment threads or the review body to engage with the agent directly.

Code Review
Analyzes pull requests for code quality, potential issues, and security concerns. Provides feedback and suggested fixes. Automatically triggered on new or reopened PRs (can be disabled for AWS registered installations), or manually with /q review slash command in a comment.

Customization

You can create project-specific rules for Amazon Q Developer to follow:

  1. Create a .amazonq/rules folder in your project root.
  2. Add Markdown files in this folder to define rules (e.g., cdk-rules.md).
  3. Write detailed prompts in these files, such as coding standards or best practices.
  4. Amazon Q Developer will automatically use these rules when generating code or providing assistance.

Example rule:

All Amazon S3 buckets must have encryption enabled, enforce SSL, and block public access.
All Amazon DynamoDB Streams tables must have encryption enabled.
All Amazon SNS topics must have encryption enabled and enforce SSL.
All Amazon SNS queues must enforce SSL.

Feedback

To provide feedback on Amazon Q Developer, create an issue in the Amazon Q Developer public repository.

For more detailed information, visit the Amazon Q for GitHub documentation.

Footnotes

  1. Amazon Q Developer uses generative AI. You may need to verify generated code before using it in your environment. See the AWS Responsible AI Policy.

Copy link

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Security Upgrade Review Summary

This PR upgrades urllib3 from 1.26.5 to 2.6.0 to address security vulnerabilities SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-14192442 and SNYK-PYTHON-URLLIB3-14192443. While the security fix is important, this is a major version upgrade that introduces breaking changes.

Critical Concerns:

  • Breaking Changes: urllib3 2.x has API changes and dropped Python 3.6 support
  • Dependency Conflicts: The PR description shows multiple dependency version conflicts
  • Old Dependencies: The project uses very old versions (requests 2.20, boto3 1.4.5, etc.) that may not be compatible with urllib3 2.x

Recommendation:

Before merging, thoroughly test the Lambda function to ensure it still works correctly with the new urllib3 version. Consider updating other dependencies if compatibility issues arise, or evaluate if a more conservative urllib3 version (like 1.26.18) would provide security fixes without breaking changes.


You can now have the agent implement changes and create commits directly on your pull request's source branch. Simply comment with /q followed by your request in natural language to ask the agent to make changes.

zappa==0.20.2
wheel>=0.38.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
urllib3>=1.26.5 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
urllib3>=2.6.0 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛑 Breaking Change Risk: This major version upgrade from urllib3 1.26.5 to 2.6.0 introduces breaking changes that may cause compatibility issues with the existing old dependencies. urllib3 2.x dropped support for Python 3.6 and has API changes that could break requests 2.20 and other dependencies. The PR description already shows dependency conflicts. Test thoroughly before merging to ensure the Lambda function still works correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants