ci: don't assume full shell for postUpgradeTasks #3352
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Newer versions of renovate are more conservative about allowing arbitrary shell primitives inside of commands to prevent accidental escapes from the allowlist. This changes the one place where we do want a "fancy" shell feature to explicitly opt into execution under bash. The command in question should be static enough to be safe.
angular-robot
bot
added
the
area: build & ci
alan-agius4
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2026
Contributor
|
This PR was merged into the repository. The changes were merged into the following branches:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Newer versions of renovate are more conservative about allowing arbitrary shell primitives inside of commands to prevent accidental escapes from the allowlist. This changes the one place where we do want a "fancy" shell feature to explicitly opt into execution under bash. The command in question should be static enough to be safe.