Closed
Conversation
0673a78 to
bffc5f2
Compare
de9b698 to
017b7ce
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…ace into sat_detection
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
…ace into sat_detection
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closed in favour of #4301
This PR ports the saturation method from IBL. It will introduce a new data type for holding information on events / periods of noise / saturation etc. This will take the form of a numpy recarray with fields (draft names):
This will also require:
silence_periods.pyto handle this new data typeOther notes:
remove_artefacts.pyhandles a slightly different use case (triggers at known timepoints contaminating the recording, which may also be imputed with a model-based approach) and so is not considered here