Skip to content

V4.0 Arming updates#496

Merged
deadbytefpv merged 19 commits intoExpressLRS:masterfrom
deadbytefpv:v4arming
Feb 13, 2026
Merged

V4.0 Arming updates#496
deadbytefpv merged 19 commits intoExpressLRS:masterfrom
deadbytefpv:v4arming

Conversation

@deadbytefpv
Copy link
Collaborator

@deadbytefpv deadbytefpv commented Dec 8, 2025

No description provided.

@deadbytefpv deadbytefpv marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2026 09:37
@ot0tot
Copy link
Contributor

ot0tot commented Feb 12, 2026

Need to make the alternate arming method behavior more clear when using non-full-res switch modes. i.e. When using Wide/Hybrid switch modes, Ch5 is still a one-bit arm channel at the receiver, but the arming status is set by the alternate arming switch instead of the Ch5 value output by the radio.

@deadbytefpv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Need to make the alternate arming method behavior more clear when using non-full-res switch modes. i.e. When using Wide/Hybrid switch modes, Ch5 is still a one-bit arm channel at the receiver, but the arming status is set by the alternate arming switch instead of the Ch5 value output by the radio.

Are the changes I made makes it a bit more clearer now?

@ot0tot
Copy link
Contributor

ot0tot commented Feb 12, 2026

LGTM!

Copy link
Member

@CapnBry CapnBry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added CH14 with an asterisk to the switch-config table, as well as bolded the fullres CH5 fields that are sent in every packet

Rest looks good!

@deadbytefpv
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I added CH14 with an asterisk to the switch-config table, as well as bolded the fullres CH5 fields that are sent in every packet

Rest looks good!

Thanks Cap'n!

@deadbytefpv deadbytefpv merged commit 6dd77a9 into ExpressLRS:master Feb 13, 2026
1 check passed
@deadbytefpv deadbytefpv deleted the v4arming branch February 13, 2026 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants