WIP status of the project

[symbiont-joseph-kachmar]

Currently the project description is:

[WIP] inlining of self-recursive definitions
...but it looks like the package is up on Hackage and is being used by polysemy for GHC > 8.7.

Does it make sense to remove the WIP label?

[TheMatten]

I would rather keep WIP status for now - there's bug with compiler crashing on uses without type signatures and I'm planning to reimplement it, possibly as a core pass plugin, to hopefully fix this problem and to avoid depending on quirk in optimization - I would like to inline function bodies directly instead.

[typetetris]

@TheMatten : Maybe you could describe, what you wanted to do, so others could try it, if you are missing the time at the moment?

[TheMatten]

After some discussion with other maintainers we've ended up deciding to ditch loopbreaker altogether and instead think about best way of making use of ghc-proposals/ghc-proposals#313, which should solve multiple existing problems at once.

[typetetris]

Care to mention that in the README.md ?

[TheMatten]

Ok, will do. (edit: 04e3b2e)